In response to:

Sandra Fluke: Opposing the Contraception Mandate Is Just Like Opposing Leukemia Coverage

AmyDB Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 7:13 PM
jeanheart said.... I still call it heckling. __________ You can call it what you wish. Most sensible people would call it answering a question. A question which the father asked of the audience. He asked the question.... By the dictionary definition it wasn't heckling.... 1. to harass (a public speaker, performer, etc.) with impertinent questions, gibes, or the like; badger.
Buck O Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 7:23 PM
Leftists always try to win arguments by redefining words to mean what THEY say the words mean, and to hell with dictionaries.
psydoc Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 7:21 PM
I take it back, jeanhart, I am losing hope that there IS hope for you.

Any, we covered that with her over and over, even gave her the link to the actual situation in which Mr. Henslin asked the question, waited for an answer and then made the comment, "no one in this room can answer that". Reality does not seem to be her friend.
psydoc Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 7:23 PM

On MSNBC this afternoon, Sandra Fluke truly outdid herself, attempting to argue that the people who disagree with the contraception mandate on religious freedom grounds are in the same category as people who oppose insurance coverage for leukemia.

What's important to note is that some of the folks who are continuing to object to this policy are actually worried about employers who are private companies, not religiously affiliated employers in any way, but the boss has a particular religious concern, and they want to be able to deny...