In response to:

4 Reasons The GOP Would Be Foolish To Dump Social Issues

amperro Wrote: Nov 24, 2012 2:50 AM
I never said no presence overseas. I said we do not have the right to be in over 100 nations. I am not against using the military to secure the coasts and borders of this country. That IS its intended purpose. There is a huge difference between eliminating foreign threats to national security and endless occupation of nations that don't want us there, for the benefit of unsavory and corrupt leaders.

Win, lose or draw, we're always supposedly hitting a tipping point where social issues just no longer work for the Republican Party. At first glance, this would appear to be a rather puzzling sentiment. After all, in 2010, despite the fact that the GOP was just as socially conservative as we were this year, the Republican Party had its best year in half a century. Furthermore, in 2008 and 2012, the GOP lost despite running moderate candidates who were soft on social issues and who barely brought them up at all. If anything, you'd think that seeing two non-social conservatives...