Unless the Democrats also split into another, more liberal, party they'd keep the 47% - 50% they have now, the Republicans and new Conservative Party would split the other 50% to 53% and conservatives would lose every single election until we got back together again.

How about splitting the issues and immediately pass a bill (in the House and send it to the Senate) which does nothing except secure the border. Tell the comprehensive reform folks we'll figure that part out only AFTER the border is secured.

I do not believe we need to form another conservative party. We need to make the Republican Party more conservative. Forming another party would most likely split the conservative vote and dilute the strength of the conservative movement.

You mean like while Chris Matthews et. al. were thumping their copies of "The Origin of the Species" praying to the ancient alien astronauts that the terrorists were white tea-partiers protesting Tax Day?

The thing that worries me most about this last terrorist attack in Boston is this: If you were a jihadist a saw one grown man and a teenager effectively shut down a major American city for a week, at a massive cost to us, and very little cost to them, wouldn't you be saying to yourself, "We ought to do this more often!" Obama better call George Dubya back as a consultant, and ask him: "Please tell me how you managed to keep us safe for those 7 years after 9-11?"

Just to compare: 1) Picture Christ on the cross in a jar of urine. 2) Draw a cartoon of Mohammed. Then, after each incident, count the dead bodies.

Now you can see why Gov. Christie was not invited to CPAC.

An argument always used against the pro-life position has been to make abortions "safe, legal, and rare" so women don't resort to "back-alley" abortions. Yeah, sure. Instead of a back alley, send them to Kermit Gosnell's hell-hole for a legal abortion.

The slave master had the legal right to take from the slave everything he produced. The slave master had the legal right to determine the "needs" of the slave. He provided the slave with healthcare, housing, and job-training. Don't you wonder, after living under this progressive ideal society, they wanted individual liberty instead?

Liberal logic: Wanting to own a gun is proof that you are too paranoid to pass a background check and you should not be allowed to own a gun. There is simply no telling what you are liable to do with one. You might shoot up the place trying to defend yourself. Only those who agree that they don't "need" a gun are sane enough pass a liberal's background check.

I suppose you think Newton and Einstein were irrational? (They both believed in God.) As does anyone with any rational sense. It is irrational to observe the universe and not see the design of a Creator.