In response to:

Missouri Dems: Let’s Just Force Gun Owners to Surrender, Destroy Their Weapons

AmericanLiberal Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 2:01 PM
DB:***Your first post: "You clowns are the punks. You need weapons to feel like a man. You gin up danger so that you can feel like a man. It is stupid, destructive, and inimical to civilized prosperity." Now, what were you saying?*** I was responding to someone who called liberals "punks." And you'll note the objective argument behind the insult. I suggest you try it sometime.
gatorbait Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 2:05 PM

these clowns want give up their guns mommie,,,,

_,l,, Vaporise this, Thought Police ,,l,_ Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 2:04 PM
I don't think you understand what "objective" or "subjective" mean other than fancy buzzwords to punctuate you rants.
And you call people "chump," "son" and "little buddy" all the time.
SageAdvice68 Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 2:03 PM
I do hope everyone understands....To surrender your God granted rights spelled out in our Bill of Rights to perverts like this Un-AmericanLibturd queerbait, is in fact the same thing as dropping your pants, bending over and letting Barack Hugochavez Obutthole.....Obutthole you.....

Yes, Democrats like this Un-AmericanLibturd POS have been doing this for years.....They like getting Obuttholed!!
Ken6226 Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 2:03 PM
I've not seen any objective arguments from you. Just the same old talking points.
Ken6226 Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 2:07 PM
You liberals always tell us perception is reality. I perceive you're an idiot.
AmericanLiberal Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 2:17 PM
Perception is not reality, but rational perception is a good approximation.

Why wait for the supply to dry up over time when you could just force gun owners to surrender or destroy their weapons immediately? Missouri Democrats think it’s a good idea:

Democrats in the state House have proposed a bill that would force gun owners to either surrender or destroy weapons including semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines and semi-automatic pistols with a fixed magazine that can shoot more than 10 rounds before being reloaded.

Ammunition-feeding devices that can hold more than 10 rounds also would be banned. Owners also could send their weapons to another...