Tell your readers, Dennis, when mentioning the mass rape of Germany in World War Two, tell them who Ilya Ehrenburg was. Was he not the Jewish propagandist whose pamphlets urged the Red Army to (and I quote): "Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, not one among the yet unborn but is evil! Follow the precepts of Comrade Stalin. Stamp out the fascist beast once and for all in its lair! Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, kill, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army." Hmmm?

That should read "of an UNrepentant tribe"

grump-pa, When you say you "don't understand the fig story", do you mean you actually don't comprehend the passage in the bible - your bible - which I'm referring to, or do you mean you don't know what "fig story" I'm talking about? the Fig story is this: It is Mark 11:12-14: "The next day as they were leaving Bethany, Jesus was hungry. Seeing in the distance a fig tree in leaf, he went to find out if it had any fruit. When he reached it, he found nothing but leaves, because it was not the season for figs. Then he said to the tree, "May no one ever eat fruit from you again." And his disciples heard him say it." Later on it's revealed that this fig tree (poor ole out-of-season fig tree) which Jesus had cursed has withered and...

Dear Dreadnaught, A few simple questions for you: 1) Our taxpayer-erected United States Holocaust Memorial Museum still shows film of the "shrunken heads", "lampshades", the Allies claimed to have found at Buchenwald. Since the most ordinary items which supporters of the Holocaust story claim are "evidence" have been RETAINED...in order to display to wide-eyed schoolkiddies (like piles of shoes, cans of insecticide, deportation schedules, etc,)... ....Where, pray tell, can I go to actually SEE these "SHRUNKEN HEADS"??? This damning physical evidence of "Holocaust crimes"??? Surely, one shrunken head (presented indeed at the Nuremberg trials as USA exhibit-254 by Thomas J. Dodd) is worth a million shoes... ...and it wouldn't have...

Read my response below to "grump-pa". As for Iraq, google "Stephen J. Sniegoski" and read his piece: "The War on Iraq: Conceived in Israel"

For me, it would have to be America *first* in the national sense, (although obviously for bare survival the family comes first ultimately as that's what nations are originally built upon)...if NOT America *first* then we are living in a transnational theocracy, right? ...where "citizens" (mere "inhabitants", actually) of the pretended "United" States, pick and choose where and when they will defend our national existence. If I were a Hindu-American*, would you feel warm and fuzzy at night if my stated attitude was that "I put Ganesha, or Shiva first"? (Shiva, being the God of Destruction), or something along the lines of the Heaven's Gate idiots, who not only want to off themselves, but the rest off us too? No, you wouldn't feel...

Thanks, grump-pa. Ya gave me all of less than 2 hours to respond. As it was today , had just enough time away from home and computer to get done with the day's tasks, tank up with 3 dollar+ gas, dodge A-holes to find the home and hearth, cook supper, eat it, pay some bills, map out tomorrow's "strategery" (ah, Bush), and then get on the net just in time to find your appraisal of my responsiveness. "Oh ye, of little faith"...

Do you want to "be in Iraq" for the next 100 years? McCain thought/still thinks(?) it's doable and necessary. (Though I reckon he'd be gone before the 100 is up, leaving our kids' kids to inherit the mess...) And no, I haven't seen Obama change anything materially, regarding this either. Do you want a general war with Iran? ...which may involve dirty bombs going off in American cities in retaliation for the unleashing of American conventional force upon Israel's chief and current rival? (Hmmm. What might that do to "home prices" in the affected region?) Do you approve of selling America's financial future out to China to finance these wars on behalf of Israel, while our own borders are overrun? I understand why some Americans say...

It's funny... the sentence: "Thus, for Nazism, it was as important (if not more so) to murder Jewish babies and children -- often through as cruel a means as possible (being burned alive, buried alive or thrown up in the air and impaled on bayonets) -- as it was to murder Jewish adults."... did not make it into my newspaper's version. (daily circulation: quarter million) I wonder how that happened... Did Prager edit this out before handing it to the paper publishers... or did my newspaper edit it out? If Prager or the editors did it...was it for believability's sake? Because many people no longer believe these atrocity stories of "burning alive" and "babies tossed onto bayonets"? "Buried alive" is a new one. Hadn't heard that one...