In response to:

NYT Op/Ed: Tim Scott is a "Cynical Token," and No Symbol of Progress

alphonsejones Wrote: Dec 19, 2012 7:07 PM
wonder why the slimes is worried about a matter that is only of concern to the voters of South Carolina Tim Scott has already run and won in a district that has a majority of white voters who are only concerned about his voting record not his skin tone
Bruce2397 Wrote: Dec 19, 2012 7:18 PM
Alphonse---just so you know....the choice of Rep Scott to replace Sen DeMint is of interest to everyone in the US, because now-Sen Scott will be voting on issues that affect us all. (Jeez, its like I'm talking to an iguana...)

Also, the choice of Rep Scott is not necessarily of interest to the "voters" of South Carolina, since they didn't vote for him---he was chosen by Gov. Haley, according to SC law...
alphonsejones Wrote: Dec 19, 2012 7:48 PM
how typical

a leftie trying to make a point and again failing

since we already have witnessed how your party has marched in lock step with your marxist messiah and his plot to transform America into a socialist nightmare

which as we already know, you fully support

Remember, it isn't "progress" unless the Left approves.  On Monday, I wondered how race-obsessed liberals would react to a conservative, Indian-American, female governor appointing a conservative, African-American product of a single-parent home to the US Senate.  In the South.  To great fanfare and virtually universal applause on the Right.  In short, not well.  From today's repulsive New York Times column by Ivy League professor Adolph Reed, Jr:

When Gov. Nikki Haley of South Carolina announced on Monday that she would name Representative Tim Scott to the Senate, it seemed like another milestone...