In response to:

Colorado Governor Plans to Sign Gun Control Bills, Magpul Packs its Bags

alphonsejones Wrote: Mar 19, 2013 11:45 AM
let me understand the logic of the imbeciles in the Colorado state govt they are banning products that can be legally purchased in other states and simply carried across state lines and tyhe lesson these imbeciles fail to grasp is that prohibiting anything only makes people want them more. But there is an upside, the panty wearing losers that are members of the marxist party and those who adore messiah hussein are more then willing to give up their second amendment rights. They have simply decided being victims of thugs and other assorted criminals goes along with the other bad choices they make in their lives
JB in MS Wrote: Mar 19, 2013 12:17 PM
Saw a great example of this thinking at work in Idaho: WalMart wanted to open a store in a small city, Silver Lake, but the residents and council were all up in arms about the "evil corporation", traffic issues, competition for their local businesses, etc, etc - so WalMart went a few hundred yards past the city line and opened just inside the city limits of the next city. Silver Lake still got all the traffic, competition, etc, but Hayden got the sales tax revenue. Brilliant!

One thing about business - it will find a way, whether the greener pastures are the next city, another state, or another country. It's liberal economic illiteracy at it's finest.

After the movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado, the state’s Governor John Hickenlooper questioned whether more gun laws would really have stopped the shooter, James Holmes.

“This person, if there were no assault weapons available, if there were no this or no that, this guy’s going to find something, right?” he asked. “If it was not one weapon, it would have been another.”

But in an interview with the Associated Press in December, his tone changed. He said he needed a few months after the shooting to “let people process and grieve and get a little space”...