In response to:

Lieberman/Collins: The Terrorist Threat Level in Benghazi Was “Flashing Red”

alotto Wrote: Jan 06, 2013 9:10 PM
What was the terrorist threat level in Beriut 1983 the day 240 of our soldiers there were killed by a lone bomber? And why where there never any hearings by congress when Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger had SPECIFICALLY warned against stationing our troops there? How convenient to lay blame on the Dem Administration when there was no hue and outcry over the 7 times embassies were attacked under the prev administration. 2002: U.S. Consulate In Karachi, Pakistan; 10 Killed, 51 Injured 2004: U.S. Embassy Bombed In Uzbekistan 2004: Gunmen Stormed U.S. Consulate In Saudi Arabia 2006: Armed Men Attacked U.S. Embassy In Syria 2007: Grenade Launched Into U.S. Embassy In Athens 2008: 10 People Killed In Bombings Yemen Embassy
GodsLaws Wrote: Jan 07, 2013 2:03 PM
You're right. Since embessy's were attacted under a Republican President, we should ignore that it happened under Obama.

In fact, why don't we just ignore EVERYTHING Obama does (except of course for licking his boots and kissing his a$$ every chance we get).

Last week, former Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) and Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) published a damning joint op-ed in the Washington Times explaining -- among other things -- the myriad failures of the federal government to protect its diplomats at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya last September. And while none of the facts they cite in the article were previously unknown to the public, the findings from their congressional investigation are exceedingly difficult to stomach and worth repeating:

From the article:

We recently released the findings of our bipartisan report on the terrorist attack in Benghazi, which has...
Sunday, May 19 | 12:42 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 12:42 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 12:42 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 12:42 AM ET