In response to:

It's Come to This: Sandra Fluke Nominated for Person of the Year

Allen331 Wrote: Nov 28, 2012 11:59 PM
Quite correct, but you forgot many other distinguished losers: Nikita Khrushchev, Ayatollah Khomeini, Charles de Gaulle, Yuri Andropov, Mikhail Gorbachev, Vladimir Putin and [drum-roll] . . . . Adolf Hilter; the year just before he kicked off WWII. (I'm sure the cheap Fluke will feel right at home.)
justme16 Wrote: Nov 29, 2012 5:58 PM
I agree, those that KNOW what it is truly about and are after that result. The bulk are nothing more than toady's or puppies in a Planned Programmed Social Conditioning experiment that simply go along with the herd and spout from rote exactly what the memorized to gain acceptance of their peers or professors (sayers) The dumbed down masses conditioned to emote like perpetualy children stuck forever in either kindergarten or seventh grade. Sick Sick Sick And yet the masses celebrate that.
NullifyNow Wrote: Nov 29, 2012 6:12 AM
Allen
Left wingers are today's neo-Nazis.

Apparently in the year 2012 all you have to do to become nominated as TIME's Person of Year is throw away your dignity and beg your neighbors in front of Congress to pay for your sex life as a 30-year-old adult child. TIME asks readers, should Sandra Fluke be chosen as Person of the Year? Definitely? No way? Below is TIME's description:

As always, TIME's editors will choose the Person of the Year, but that doesn't mean readers shouldn't have their say. Cast your vote for the person you think most influenced the news this year...