1 - 8
Reagan said, "A communist is someone who has read Marx. An anti-comminist is someone who has read and understands Marx."


Hilariously and well worth repeating!
You come off so stupid that I actually wonder if you're a secret conservative having some fun at liberal expense.

Liberals didn't give a damn about Mark Foley's helpers . . They only gave a damn about his seat. Need proof? They waited until his name couldn't be removed from the ballot.

If they really cared, waiting would've been unthinkable. (But of course; liberals are the party of Barney Frank, NAMBLA, etc.)
He gave us the slanderous quote
"We had to destroy a village to save it"

Nancy Pelosi wants to pass a bill so we can read it.

(Perhaps it'll be read on C-Span)
Wanna be taken alive? Wear a uniform.

Want to be treated well? . . . Simple; Don't attack the Marines guarding you while giving your better meals then I get and giving you better health care than I get.

Gimme charge of Gitmo for just a day, and I guarantee that the habit of throwing body waste will end abruptly - Can't throw stuff with your hands cut off . . . we’ll leave the chicken[blank] lawyers outta this one, or make sure they share one of the cells.



BTW: Isn't the gent who played Eddie Haskell a conservative pro-American type? If so Ann, cut him some slack. He only portrayed a weasel. (God knows he had plenty of examples to draw from while working in the Hollywood cesspool)
In response to:

Oh, Canada!

Allen331 Wrote: Mar 27, 2010 11:15 AM
is pure fantacy, as is their love of 1st amendment free speech.

Only liberal idiots would conceive the notion of "speech codes", and the "fairness doctrine" aka the Hush Rush legislation.


Aren't liberals the most compassionate and tolerant bunch you've ever seen?
. . . that liberals don't care to bother themselves with reading 2700 pages of socialized, unwanted heath-care bills, but . . .
. . . can't they managed a sufficient attention span to read at least ten pages before they rush headlong to condemn Arizona's attempt to mirror federal law????

Correct Answer: NOPE. They can’t, since they’re too busy telling aspiring artists to shrug their day jobs in order to play guitar.



(Gee, that jug-eared lunch-money victim sure can pick a robust group of losers.)
In response to:

Children at Risk

Allen331 Wrote: Mar 23, 2010 6:23 PM
. . . was also prey to a dysfunctional family, and being cast adrift from such stability, cast his comfort with the CPUSA and spying accordingly as he sought to correct the perceived ills of his home and country (USA).

What he found out was he was only digging his/it's grave by immersing himself in a hidden secular evil . . . Communism cannot really pull off the ability to replace the intact family unit.

Rather, he had an epiphany - He chose God's wisdom over the wisdom of man, and cast his lot on America's side.
It cost him the ire of every liberal idiot, but cost those idiots much more. He properly exposed the traitor – Alger Hiss.
He won.
Alger Hiss didn't, but you needn't worry...
In response to:

The Go-Fly List for Terrorists

Allen331 Wrote: May 07, 2010 8:35 AM
began when both Republican and Democratic senators decided the best thing to do right after 9/11 was to FEDERALIZE our screeners

Thank our congress and liberals for that knee-jerk reaction. Now we're stuck with this cumbersome entity, when we could've followed Israel's model.


Two phrases that politicians that scare me . . .
"We have to do something!" and
"it's for the children."
If either form of those phrases are uttered before legislation is passed, you can rest assured that new policy will be pure crap.
1 - 8
Friday, June 01 | 11:12 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 11:12 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 11:12 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 11:12 AM ET