Like who is NOTcontrolled and or on welfare? If you are in k-thru-12 school, most likely your lunch is subsidized. If you are in college, most likely you have a Government loan that most likely will go belly up. If you are retired you will get what the Government wants you to have and use your IRA the way the Government wants you to use it. Your health is controlled through (hippa) even without Obama care. If you buy a house, you will be most likely backed by Freddie or Fanny (verge of bankrupcy). If you make less than forty K, you get wefare. Make too much you are vilified. You must pay more for new crappy light bulbs. You rent your land and houses from big G. You are forced say only things that are PC approved. Our lives are theirs.

She needs to be in a real firefight, where no one has any idea what you are really up against. I suggest the next time we have an incident like this, we give her a Biden approved double barrel 12 GA shotgun and send her in first and see how she does.

I believe the (armed) taxing agents will be increased to level that will fulfill Obama's dream of a "national police force" financed to the same degree as the armed forces. To implement an agency called the "national police force" would have started a revolt, and he knows it. This is way of gaining complete control through deception, something he is very good at. Once the national police force is established he will most likely go after climate control with armed agents, then he will have all commerce under his control.

This discussion of armed people in schools is odd given that my children, youngest 33, experienced an armed protector in their high schools. That was 15 years ago. My boys still know the guy's name and speak of him with affection; he was well liked by all. I just assumed that having an armed, trained protector at schools was the norm; guess not, at least in the blue states. It is difficult not to believe that having a guy in school like my children had, deters gun violence and actually all violence.

Raving, you have become a bit of a lunatic. You are responding to your own blogs, which by the way have NOTHING to do with Clint Tarver; a man with a philosophical view of life we should all try to emulate.

As one who implemented large government software projects, this is a disaster. I have never been on a government installation where the cost over-runs were not astronomical and the time lines at least TRIPLE because the government could never agree on the requirements. That applied to agencies as well as defense contractors. One year, ya right. We will start right away, what would like? You don't know? Oh well then, we will start it anyway; we should know what you want eventually! Nancy Pelosi should have said: we will know what is in this bill as soon as we figure out what is in it and try to implement it... I have NEVER seen new code supporting new adaptations of this magnitude delivered in less than three years!

I for one am getting really, really, really tired of the status quo, and Jeb represents just that. I would be inclined to support an Allen West or Rand Paul. We need some substantive change and that is not Jeb Bush.

Harry old buddy, the very economist John Maynard Keynes that proposed goverment spending would shore up the economy, said it would work only short term. It would have possibly worked if Barack Obama hadn't crippled so many industries with agency and Czar regulations. On top of that he bombed us with health care and tried to start businesses that had no business getting our money. He has wasted money on failed businesses and foriegn ecomonies. I suspect even Keynes would roll his eyes at this mess. I am suspecting you are indeed Harry Reid trying to convince yourself you are great when indeed you are just another shifty politian who has made his fortune with Fed inside information.

Harry old buddy, the very economist John Maynard Keynes that proposed goverment spending would shore up the economy, said it would work only short term. It would have possibly worked if Barack Obama hadn't crippled so many industries with agency and Czar regulations. On top of that he bombed us with health care and tried to start businesses that had no business getting our money. He has wasted money on failed businesses and foriegn ecomonies. I suspect even Keynes would roll his eyes at this mess. I am suspecting you are indeed Harry Reid trying to convince yourself you are great when indeed you are just another shifty politian who has made his fortune with Fed inside information.

This archaic policy as you put it, forces the debate good or bad and brings the debt to the forefront. You however, are willing to give unfettered power to an ideological egotistical charlatan. Oh I see, when Barack Obama cries he is loving and sympathetic, when John Boehner cries, he is weak. Your post is a fools writing and I hope as Mcgovern wrote you write to create response; better than thinking you really believe this diatribe. George Bush was bad and Barack Obama is worse and two wrongs don't make a right.