In response to:

Redefining Marriage Sign of a Lost Society

allblues Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 7:57 AM
It wasn't that many years ago that the idea of Fred and Ted or Molly and Polly getting married would have brought gales of incredulous laughter. Yet here we are. It is also a certainty that we will see a serious attempt to lower the age of consent so the pervs will be able to prey on the young without fear of legal consequences. And of course, "equality" means that polygamy will be coming soon.

One significant development in the recent election was votes in four states approving same sex marriage initiatives. Until now, all previous state referenda to approve same sex marriage – 32 of them - failed.

The Wall Street Journal editorial page – a place where conservatives usually turn for intellectual capital – saw this as cause for celebration.

According to the Journal, marriage definition should come from voters, not from court orders. Americans, they argue, have “shown themselves more than capable of changing their views on gay marriage the democratic way.”

In other words, our definition of marriage should follow process, not...