In response to:

A Political Glossary Part IV

Allan12 Wrote: Jun 30, 2012 3:15 PM
I thought Jason Lewis on his radio broadcast yesterday evening gave a good job explaining the difference between socialism and libertarianism. A socialist believes in equality of OUTCOME, while a libertarian believes in equality of OPPORTUNITY. Equal opportunity ensures there will be differences in outcome, due to different abilities and availability of resources, although everyone will have the most their efforts are capable of providing. Trying to achieve equal outcome ultimately leads to all but an elite few having next to nothing everywhere it has ever been tried. The liberals/progressives in America have been working to create equal outcomes in America at least since Teddy Roosevelt resulting in a loss of middle class.
Charles3662 Wrote: Jul 01, 2012 7:01 AM
Are you brave enough to identify the Socialists/Communists/Progressives? If you do you will reach some painful conclusions. The Jewish population in America is mostly composed of liberals. Women are more liberal than men when voting. Obama has an almost 100% domination of the black vote. It may hang in your throat when you say it, but those groups are dominated by a desire for equal outcomes.

Editor's note: This is Part IV in a series. Part I can be found here. Part II can be found here. Part III can be found here.

Nowhere is political rhetoric more shameless -- or more dangerous -- than in the pious names that politicians give to the legislation they pass. Perhaps the most egregious example is the so-called "Indian Child Welfare Act," which callously sacrifices the welfare of Indian children.

Time and again, children with some American Indian ancestry, who have been adopted by families that are not of that ancestry, have been suddenly taken by law from...