In response to:

The Last Clinton Lie Makes a Difference

allamericancouple Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 10:45 AM
There are many question that we are asking and we want answers to. Like, why were military support teams told to stand down when they were ready to deploy to stop this attack? Who led this attack and where did their weapons come from? These two questions are most important because they directly reflect on another event. Why did General Petreus expose his extramarital affair when he did and step down from his position as CIA director. It all ties together. Petreus knew that our govrnment had been supplying arms to Syrian rebels and Al Queida operatives in the region and these were the ones who attacked the compound. Obama and Hillary didn't want that information leaked out. They threatened Petreus to expose him if he told the truth.
allamericancouple Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 10:49 AM
This is why Petreus, with his remaining dignity and honor, came forward on his own. The rats in Washington knew about his affair but held it silent until it would benefit their purpose. These are the kinds of people we have leading this nation and they must be stopped. Obama and Clinton could have stopped this attack but chose to let these Americans die to maintain their cover up of supplying arms to these rebels. Both of those ex-seals should receive our nation's highest honor and Obama and Clinton should be held accountable for treason.

Let’s roll the tape:

"With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest, or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and to do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, senator."

It was a dazzling play, instantly destined to enter the lore of political hardball and be studied and dissected for decades.