In response to:

Women Serving in Combat Positions Is a Batty Idea

AliveInHim Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 5:17 PM
I say the womyn promoting this nonsense should be the first to be drafted, as well as their totally inadequate 'male' counterparts. This is precisely why liberals promote women in combat, and this is how it manifests. They're inadequate, they're cowards, and just as they want someone else to take care of them (without, of course, using any of their own resources), so they want someone else (with the guns they hate) to fight for them.

Last Thursday Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and other U.S. military leaders lifted the ban on women serving in combat positions. I, for one, think this is a great idea and have a few modest proposals, if the brass inside the beltway is open to suggestions, on how they should deploy the dames (and whom they should deploy).

First off, if you truly want to eviscerate the enemy—namely Muslims—then I propose sending the most nerve grating and foul women Hollywood has to offer straight into hot zones as our forward armies. I’m a thinkin’ starting off with Roseanne Barr, Joy...