Join the Debate!
Login in to Post Your Comments
An AP story reporting comments from the President highlights again -- as if more proof were needed -- why it's such a terrible idea to be trying terrorists in civilian court.
Apparently, President Obama had this to say about the trial of Khalid Sheik Muhammed:
Obama said those offended by the legal privileges given to Muhammed by virtue of getting a civilian trial rather than a military tribunal won't find it "offensive at all when he's convicted and when the
Apparently, President Obama had this to say about the trial of Khalid Sheik Muhammed:
Obama said those offended by the legal privileges given to Muhammed by virtue of getting a civilian trial rather than a military tribunal won't find it "offensive at all when he's convicted and when the
Breaking on TOWNHALL
- Quotes of the day Allahpundit 5 hours ago
- Open thread: The Wisconsin recall debate Allahpundit 6 hours ago
- Dana Milbank says the GOP should sacrifice the unborn for Asian-American votes Dustin Siggins 7 hours ago
- Uh oh: New York City Council president breaks with Bloomberg over “punitive” soda ban Allahpundit 7 hours ago
- Video: Deval Patrick heroically shields Elizabeth Warren from having to explain her ancestry nonsense Allahpundit 8 hours ago
- Bill Clinton headed to Wisconsin to campaign against Scott Walker Allahpundit 9 hours ago
No Good, Either Way
Failing the likelihood of that ever happening, we conservatives would be all for war tribunals since what KSM and his ilk did and want to do ARE acts of war, after all.
Holder's justification for this is that KSM was implicit in killing American civilians rather than military personnel, even though KSM's cohorts are being tried by military tribunals. What kind of logic is this?
Eric Holder was part of Clinton's cabinet-why didn't he prosecute the USS Cole bombers in civilian court? Oh, I forgot; he was too busy pardoning FALN terrorists...