Do you even *read* the articles on which you post your verbal graffiti?

How does your comment pertain to "Sex-Crazed Co-Eds Going Broke Buying Birth Control" at Georgetown University?

:)

Of all the things you have written, this is my favorite.

Do you even *read* the articles on which you post your verbal graffiti?

Hey mehoneygogojuice (2:55PM), ED is a disease, pregnancy is not. And by the way, no federal government should compel anyone to give ED-covered insurance, as well as birth control. "Women's health" not been discussed, yet you mention it. Straw man. If you knew anything about the Bible, Christians, Jews, and the topic under discussion regarding Obamacare, i.e *forcing* people to disobey their religion, then you wouldn't have referred to the Bible. Your revolving nom de plume, as usual, is quite tedious.

You are wasting perfectly good bandwidth.

To mouthfullofnails: The Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2011 phases out over 5 years some of the subsidies for flood insurance. As for “million dollar beachfront homes,” the current limit on liability for flood insurance is $350,000, not a million dollars. How many videos of Hurricane Katrina showed you million dollar homes, mouthfullofnails? Who are you trying to fool with your partisan slant? 21 Republicans voted against the Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2011, but only one Democrat voted against it. On July 12, 2011, the House voted on Rep. Candice Miller’s (R-MI) amendment to halt the NFIP on Jan. 1, 2012. 35 Republicans voted for it, but only 3 Dems voted for it. Who are you trying to fool, mouthfullofnails?

So we should vote for whom, Democrats? Every time you guys put up one of these "look how much money those Republicans are giving away now" posts, we only need to look at the National Taxpayers Union to see that Dems are far bigger spenders than Reps (http://www.ntu.org/ntuf/billtally-111-3.html, Table 2). "Marxist" is a bit too vague of word as it is commonly used, so why use it? But in my mental dictionary, any president who tells Joe the Plumber that he wants to "spread the wealth," and is troubled by income disparity or inequality, is close enough to being a Marxist.

... even if there is no decrease in federal government spending?"