In response to:

Obama Administration Had $2 Billion in Extra Consulate Security Money When Benghazi Attack Occured

algae Wrote: Oct 15, 2012 3:07 PM
Aren't you happy I told you about Cornell now "snerg"? HA HA HA HA.. you can't even properly interpret what you just wrote. Moron.
algae Wrote: Oct 15, 2012 3:23 PM
Sure, that's why you were quoting it all along :) Your believability is already shot libtroll.

Here's your 2nd sign "snerg".
DevilDog2531 Wrote: Oct 15, 2012 3:23 PM
bwahahahah then why does the CID WANT to have him tried on terrorism and it is fubarack that is stoppimng it?
sergeantsnerdley Wrote: Oct 15, 2012 3:19 PM
Actually, I have it in a folder marked "Legal References" on my favs list. It's on there with the Code of Federal Regulations and some VA stuff. So, you lose, loser loserman.
algae Wrote: Oct 15, 2012 3:16 PM
You wouldn't even know what it said if I hadn't given you the big fat Cornell clue.

Here's your sign "snerg"
sergeantsnerdley Wrote: Oct 15, 2012 3:12 PM
Unfortunately, I have interpreted it correctly. So has CID, and the FBI, in hasan's case.

Last week during congressional testimony from State Department officials who were on the ground in Libya, we heard over and over again that more security for the consulate in Benghazi was requested but denied. We also heard repeatedly from Democrats, including Ranking Member of the House Oversight Committee Elijah Cummings, claiming a lack of funding was at fault for less security in Benghazi during the time of the attack on 9/11 that left four Americans dead. State Department officials said funding had nothing to do with the situation and now, Chairman Darrell Issa has revealed the State Department is sitting...