Previous 21 - 30 Next
“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.” Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler
Thanks for the link WJF. IMHO, you're a good soul.
Hmm.. I though it was the qu_eer "baby's" that were goin' down. Maybe there is a vernacular inconsistency somewhere. Townhall adjust your naughty word parser :D
Ø seeks to enhance his credibility and claim to that Nobel "Peace" Prize. Right. What a legacy.
Au contraire. He fully realizes they are one and the same. Since the 1930's, when formed, the Muslim Brotherhood has been a militant arm of fascism. Ø is their bestest buddy and a traitor to this nation.
If reporters aren't doing their job it is more than likely they are willing members of the Ø admin's propaganda apparatus. Or more interested in keeping their job despite ethical considerations because the company they work for is part of the same apparatus. In other words, spineless toadies of no value.
It all depends on what your definition of "wealth" is. Or "is" is. A 9 figure income is hardly anything these days. :D
In response to:

Sotomayor makes case for affirmative action

algae Wrote: Jun 23, 2014 4:17 PM
From recent book: "Blood Feud: The Clintons vs. the Øs" "We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with." Clinton was the first Ø appointee to point to "inflammatory material posted on the Internet" as the cause of the Benghazi attack. She flat out lied to the American people like a good little toady in presenting the administration's phoney narrative. It really doesn't matter if she was told to say it or made it up on her own. The fact remains it was a lie meant to insulate Ø from criticism before the elections. There are more than enough Constitutional violations to impeach Ø. Unfortunately, the typical response to pursuing impeachment has been a variety of "at this point, what difference does it make?" on the part of most of our "government", including both parties. the Senate, the House and the Judiciary. Hence we are witness to the unbridled usurpation of authority by Ø. Because he can .. and he knows it.
In response to:

Sotomayor makes case for affirmative action

algae Wrote: Jun 23, 2014 12:36 AM
Here's your break "PH"... For most people It is not necessary to "spell it out", when referring to soft bigotry, which is what the dems shifted to because their hard bigotry they previously practiced was too easy to recognize. Judging from your post, soft bigotry is just peachy with you. I suggest someone with "historian" in their name start with the timeline of fact since you seemed to have conveniently skipped that step. Read and comprehend: http://stoprepublicans.blogspot.com/2006/05/history-of-republican-evil.html
"love giving people their guns" I'm still waiting for the NRA to give me a gun. In fact, I don't know anyone who has received a gun gratis from NRA. Is there a sign up sheet? :D
If one starts by attempting to usurp the Constitution, it is unlikely that that person would cooperate voluntarily and step down in accordance with it's rules. Forcible removal then becomes a viable option under law, particularly if impeachment doesn't work due to an extraordinary depth of corruption. There's not many more Constitutional options after that.
Previous 21 - 30 Next