1 - 10 Next
comment by BhamRedsFan • 12 hours ago Under the logic used to lampoon this Arizona bill and others like it, if I am a baker and a member of the KKK walks in to my bakery asking me to bake a cake for his white supremacist rally, I cannot refuse to bake the cake on religious grounds. Regardless of my religious beliefs or personal preferences I, a private baker, am compelled to bake this man a cake. That’s an absurd result in any universe. If Baker A will not bake you cake, that’s Baker A’s prerogative. There is no legitimate basis to compel Baker A to bake you a cake, regardless of the circumstances.
Question of the day: Two lesbian pigs walk into a Christian bakery and demand that the baker bake a cake saying 2+2=5. If Winston, the baker, refuses, should he be fined thousands of dollars for not submitting to the demand of the two lesbian pigs? Should the two lesbian women hold up four fingers of their hand and ask repeatedly how many fingers they are holding up? Should Winston be forced to close down his bakery is he refuses to answer 5? Should he be tortured until he replies 5? In what kind of a society can two lesbian pigs use the power of the state to coerce a decent human being to state that 2+2=5, because no one can refuse their demands, no matter how deformed, dysfunctional, or unethical?
Project much?
Hello, check out my blog if you like my comments - lots more writing there alessandrareflections. wordpress. com
Future historians will likely be flummoxed by the moment we're living in. In what amounts to less than a blink of an eye in the history of Western civilization, homosexuality has gone from a diagnosed mental disorder to something to be celebrated -- or else. =============== And future historians will easily see that Western civilization went into the hands of gaystapo thanks to CINO's like Goldberg. At least Goldberg and others like him could stop any further pretense and start labeling themselves "liberal Republicans" - because that's all they are.
In 2000, Jonathan Rauch, a (gay) brilliant intellectual and champion of gay marriage, wrote a wonderful essay on "hidden law," which he defined as "the norms, conventions, implicit bargains, and folk wisdoms that organize social expectations, regulate everyday behavior, and manage interpersonal conflicts." ==================== You mean Rauch basically took what dozens of sociologists have been writing about and defining for more than century, tacked on his own little label ("hidden law"), and claimed to have come up with a new original concept? Not any brilliant anything, just a stupid h0mo then, failing to give proper credit to decades of sociological thought. It seems Goldberg is unaware that any Sociology 101 course covers all of this (norms, conventions, unwritten rules, etc.)! So he thinks the pinko Rauch invented the concept!!! Too funny...
Who does more violence in society and is the most extremist: liberals (including LGBTs) or the Westboro folks? The answer is clearly liberals (including LGBTs). In the US alone, there are millions and millions of liberals perpetrating all kinds of violent and non-violent crime in the area of sexuality and relationships – and they all believe that homosexuality is normal. LGBTs in particular compose the group that does the most violence to other LGBTs, and that’s when they are not doing harm and violence to heterosexuals (including children and adolescents). The Westboro folks, on the other hand, as far as has been reported, do basically no violence and no crime. Where have you seen a Westboro member sexually harass someone of the same sex? Or commit date rape? Or produce child porn? Nowhere. But you can find plenty of liberals (including LGBTs) who think homosexuality is normal who constantly do all these horrible crimes and many other harmful acts. Here we have those violent disgusting liberals calling the nonviolent WBC "hateful." That's rich.
Freedom of conscience means that no one has to support a rapist, or porn0grapher, or a sexual molester, or a swinger, or a person with a homosexual problem, etc., when they are being "themselves" - that is, when they want to push their deformed sexuality agenda and coerce me to push it too. This is what this bill would have protected - and which is what the 1st Amendment is written to protect. But liberals have thrown the 1st Amendment in the trash. When we have freedom of conscience, we have the choice not to provide services to destructive or immoral people of any kind. This is why the concept of sexual orientation discrimination is a fraud. Liberals also wrongly claim that Jesus commands people to push perverted sexuality agendas in society directly or indirectly, because some sexuality pig demands that they do. This is where you separate the true Christians from the chaff. True Christians do not put themselves at the service of evil or immorality. They don't endorse it or cave in to it simply because other people try to twist their arm. In other words, Christians don't follow pigs of people on Earth. Either they set their own course, or they've forsaken their own religion - and especially Jesus. This is just one more episode showing that many politicians are for sale and some sell out for nothing more than a couple of bucks.
In response to:

The ENDA Freedom in America

Alessandra3 Wrote: Nov 14, 2013 11:28 AM
Most people don't read your comments, and they feel it's a waste of time to reply to a sexually perverted troll like yourself. It's not rocket science.
In response to:

The ENDA Freedom in America

Alessandra3 Wrote: Nov 14, 2013 11:26 AM
No one has any obligation to work for people who are destroying society because of their political agenda or to employ any such person. It’s no different than being forced to employ any other individual with a harmful ideology. There is no such thing as equating “sexual orientation” to race (or any in-born physical characteristics), thus legislation that equate it to racial discrimination is empty of meaning. It is a fraudulent concept at its very root. This is just one more case that evidences that every piece of legislation regarding discrimination based on sexual orientation is a fraud and must be scrapped. Lastly, and the most important point in all of this, is that once you establish a “protected class” for whom different laws apply, you’ve clearly done away with equal protection before the law. ENDA isn't just a push for a special right - it will forcibly bring about the persecution and discrimination of anyone who doesn't normalize homosexuality and transgender-ism Everyone who has such problems (LGBTs) is responsible for investigating their underlying psychological problems that produce their dysfunctional sexual psychologies. Having a major problem with heterosexuality is no reason to force employers to keep such people on staff.
1 - 10 Next