In response to:

Anti-Establishment? Anti-Obama? Yes and Yes

Alan from NJ Wrote: Jun 07, 2010 6:49 AM

lack of knowledge are vastly overdone. She is a quick study, and probably knows the meaning of the word 'is' and how many states are in the USA. She has foundational ideas that are not for Socialism, and a person of actions, not words. I would, however, treasure her role as a loose cannon, saying just what she wants, not beholden to anyone. A dangerous person to Washington cronies.
But I really wanted to say that the MSM would totally misinterpret this article to mean just anger against incumbents. Not so. Anger against RINOs and political players. The hated tea party people would choose people who would get private sector employment up, ans so would I. They would get a person who has no problems with the Constitution, and so would...

Join the Debate!

Read Full Story

Anti-Establishment? Anti-Obama? Yes and Yes

They were seemingly the best of times, but they ended up looking like the worst of times.

That is, things have turned out pretty badly for one particular congressional candidate and the party that endorsed him.

Much has been said and written about the current and ever-growing backlash against Washington. Is it an “anti-incumbent thing?” Or is it an “anti-Democrat, anti-Obama thing?” Is the momentum moving against the Democrats and in favor of the Republicans, or is it more about ideals and principals and less about political parties?