In response to:

The Resurrection

AK Mark Wrote: Dec 21, 2012 1:26 AM
Right, and you have read the docs and the history and are able to converse intelligently about the evidence. You are a closed minded person. But there is always hope, even for the most stubborn.
Scot62 Wrote: Dec 21, 2012 1:56 AM
You'll notice that DagNabbit does not engage with any of the author's points. He just says, "He's stupid" so he doesn't have to. He's too intellectually superior to have to have reasons for what he believes, don't you know. I find most "skeptics" to have this same mentality, while most Christians can articulate what they believe and why.
At the very core of Christianity is the historical authenticity of the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ. But for His resurrection, we would not be celebrating His birth.

The Apostle Paul said, "And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain."

Christian apologist Josh McDowell spent more than 700 hours studying the subject of the resurrection and concluded that it "is one of the most wicked, vicious, heartless hoaxes ever foisted upon the minds of men, or it is the most amazing fact of history." When a university student asked him why he...