In response to:

Obama to the World: Damn America, Full Speed Ahead

Akagi2 Wrote: Apr 15, 2010 1:17 AM
The US at the end of the process will still have some 1,500 nuclear weapons...a stockpile nearly 4 times as large as China's...how many do you need? If 1,500 is too few, explain why is this so and how you reach your conclusion?

As for the offer of not using nuclear weapons on a NPT country or one that even if it hasn't signed the NPT, abides by it was simply a carrot to Iran and the DPRK that obtaining nuclear weapons will make them less secure not more. The statement wouldn't cover Al Qaeda.

Also, such a policy is not written in stone. Nothing binds the US to the policy nor prevents the US from simply changing it.

The charge that this has compromised US security is baseless.

As for the so-called and...

In February 1945, three world leaders -- FDR, Stalin and Churchill -- gathered in Yalta, in Crimea, to discuss the fate of post-war Europe. At that conference, FDR signed away half of Germany, all of Poland, enslavement of the German population to the Soviet Union. While the conference suggested that liberated countries would be granted free elections, no enforcement mechanism was put in place, so the Soviets effectively annexed every piece of land they occupied.

Game Change FREE

FDR insisted he had not been duped. "Poor Neville Chamberlain believed he could trust Hitler," FDR said days after...