In response to:

3 Reasons To Stop Obsessing Over Obama's Birth Certificate

Akagi2 Wrote: Jul 02, 2009 1:36 PM

So Jo, you calling the US Consul General in Lahore at the time a liar? Then why did the NY Times in June of 1981 do a travel piece on Lahore? Why did the Consul General in Lahore welcome more American tourists in a letter to the editor to the same newspaper in August of 1981 but warned them of the Indian requirement that while Pakistan issued 30-day visas at its land crossing, India would only do so at its airports and due to this some Americans had be stranded in Pakistan?

There was no travel ban to Pakistan in 1981, Pakistan didn't issue visas only to government officials.

"At that time they only gave them to press, diplomats and their “guests”, and direct relatives only. They were very leary of any American so very few...

Join the Debate!

Read Full Story

3 Reasons To Stop Obsessing Over Obama's Birth Certificate

Since it is a constitutional requirement that the President be born in the United States, it's understandable that some people have been concerned about where Barack Obama was born. Furthermore, when you consider the fact that Barack Obama is a shameless liar, that he grew up in another country, and that there has been a lot of conflicting information out there, it's easy to see why so many people have become concerned about where he was born.