In response to:

Hope and Change ... the Constitution

Ahenobarbus Wrote: Mar 26, 2010 2:54 PM
...uses my argument about the Civil Rights Act to declare that I am in favor of institutional racism, he or she needs to re-read the Constitution. Blacks in this country were being denied their constitutional rights. The Civil Rights Act had the effect of making illegal a host of laws that were already illegal. The problems should have be addressed by constitutional challenges to those laws. By adding a redundant layer of law on top of existing constitutional rights, this society gave the impression that government had to pass a law in order to give its citizens rights. This legal philosophy has injected into society and the body politic the notion that our rights are not open-ended and limitless unless otherwise proscribed, but narrow...

We live in a fundamentally different country from that which existed only days ago. The government now requires that every American purchase health insurance. The Constitution has been attacked, interpreted in a way beyond its original intent. Therefore, we must change it.

Ignoring the will of the majority of the American people, the discouraging experiences of countries with socialized medicine, and the already staggering amount of entitlement debt, President Barack Obama and the congressional Democrats "reformed" health care. Once a nation under a Constitution that restricted government intrusion, we now want government to provide for our "needs" by calling...

Friday, June 01 | 02:35 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 02:35 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 02:35 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 02:35 AM ET