Not that hard, all one has to do is look for 98% of HermanBB's comments at Town Hall.

Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva's paper in The Journal of Medical Ethics posits that only irrational religious or moral objections stand in the way of infanticide. And we know that before he was elected to the US Senate, President Obama vigorously opposed an Illinois bill to outlaw deliberately allowing newborns to die of starvation, dehyradtion and neglect, if the newborn had survived an attempted abortion. It sounds like hyperbole, but it HHS can force a religious group to pay for abortion, why could HHS not just as easily force the group to pay for infanticide?

Can you not see the absurdity of saying that G-d does not know about genetics, or that He did not know about it then, but does now? G-d is by definition omniscient and created the world, including the laws of genetics. Even assuming your unrpoven conclusion that sexual preferences are genetic, what you are describing is not G-d; you are describing some pagan construct.

Whereas you hate Jews because you think they are waging war on Christians in the United States, are stingy, and cheat people in business. Or at least that's what you said on the Jacoby thread. Let;'s not pretend that you are objective either, Herm.

Wrong, but what should I expect from you? Many of the 700,000 left months before the 1948 war, at the urging of Arab leaders, and months before there was an Israel to kick them off of anything. Others were forced out during combat when the war that Arab nations launched to exterminate Israel failed. Those who did not flee before the war, and who did not aid the Arab invading armies, are today citizens of Israel (as are their descendants), with full legal rights to own property, vote, serve in the legislature and the courts. Starting and losing wars of genocide has consequences.

Bondman, although you are correct, I just looked up-thread and saw arpiem claim that only a few thousand Jews perished in the Holocaust (he later amended this to 3,000,000 which still suggests that "the Jews" doubled the actual number) and that Jews are responsible for the number of abortions in the US. Anyone who spouts that kind of nonsense is not likely to be interested in what the Torah has to say about whether Jews are a people. He considers them a people when it allows him to blame Jews for things he doesn't like, and a religion when it comes to exercising national sovereignty. In other words, heads he wins, tails Jews lose.

"Speaking of hate I have lost count of the number of times Israel-firsters write in to TOWNHALL and suggest the U.S. drop atomic bombs on Islamic countries. " Yeah, zero is a hard number to count.

"Any Jew will tell you that also?" Make that "any Jew who never learned the Jewish laws governing who is a Jew. Any Jew who believes in the Orthodox Jewish religion will tell you that Jew is a nationality. If Jewish referred only to religion and not to nationality, most Israelis -- including many of the founders of the state, and all of its prime ministers for the first 30 years of its existence -- would be non-Jews. According to Torah, if your mother was Jewish, you are a Jew, whether you believe in Judaism or not. (Conversion is a separate matter not relevant here, except that the same rule applies to children born to a woman after she duly converted to Judaism.) You can find these laws in the 4th chapter of Tractate Kiddushin.

Dreadnought, I can't agree that every Muslim is an anti-Semite; I've met any number who aren't. That's not to minimize the risk -- and the anti-Semitic nature -- of Islamism and of many recognized Islamic leaders, clerics, theologians, and activists. Nor is it to minimze the terrorism that emanates from that camp. But every Muslim? Sorry. But anyone who wants proof that anti-Semitism is on the rise in the US only needs to look at how many places tolerate comments (and commentors) of the likes of HermanBB, and ask themselves whether similar comments would have been tolerated in polite society 10 or 20 years ago.

"Anti-Semitism is a growing sickness in this country?" Yes, as recently as five or 10 years ago, the type of comments you customarily make about Jews would have been found only at places like Stormfront. These days your kind of slander and hatred are popping up in more and more places, including the university discussion groups comments section of otherwise respectable newspapers and magazines.

"Jews are never portrayed as cheap, arrogant or shady business dealers. " I'm sure that breaks your heart. But if you'd like to see negative stereotyped depictions of Jews, you can tune into Two Broke Girls. Or The Good Wife. Or LA LAw. Or countless other shows. Just not every week, so you may have missed them. Your problem, Herm, is that you think all the libels and stereotypes about Jews are sefl-evidently and universally true, so when more rational people don't go around spouting them, you assume they must either be duped, paid off or intimidated. Tell me, did Jews pay off Clement VI or did they intimidate him into saying that Jews did not cause the Black Death?