In response to:

Redefining Marriage Sign of a Lost Society

Chicken George Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 12:46 AM
Good insight.
Chicken George Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 4:19 AM
Absolutely right. Well put1776
jkash1776 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 2:12 AM
Kunta kinte, you know as well as I do that only one side of this issue has actually bothered to do any research. the other side just wants to have a failed society so as to avoid looking at the destruction that their thoroughly self-absorbed, sexually out of control (hetero and homo) inclinations have wreaked upon society.

Just their very language proves it. They scream intolerance and search for ever more ways to make sure all that disagree with them are ultimately persecuted into oblivion. They don't care about family or the future because the sexual/hormonally driven life only cares about now..just like Rome. The fact that they don't see that just proves how their progress since Rome is non-existent.

One significant development in the recent election was votes in four states approving same sex marriage initiatives. Until now, all previous state referenda to approve same sex marriage – 32 of them - failed.

The Wall Street Journal editorial page – a place where conservatives usually turn for intellectual capital – saw this as cause for celebration.

According to the Journal, marriage definition should come from voters, not from court orders. Americans, they argue, have “shown themselves more than capable of changing their views on gay marriage the democratic way.”

In other words, our definition of marriage should follow process, not...