In response to:

What's Wrong with Public Nudity?

goldilocks Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 1:47 PM
IMHO, Prager is trying to combine religion and politics which do not combine.
goldilocks Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 9:10 AM
so true. i have done that myself a few times.
rmccarthy Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 2:09 AM
There's the good side of eclectic and the bad side
I've been on both sides
and sometimes people got the sides mixed up.
goldilocks Wrote: Dec 15, 2012 1:15 PM
most of us are eclectic

which makes us




rmccarthy Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 11:11 PM
The world is a hodgepodge of different levels of messed up, different experiences, different beliefs. Complaining about how the Bible says the world indeed is is futile...go do some good armed with the truth about the world and yourself and accept the blessings and promises of God.
rmccarthy Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 2:17 PM
In humans, not much do combine.
If you want to understand Leftism -- and everyone needs to because it has been the most dynamic religion of the last one hundred years -- one good place to start is with San Francisco.

Or perhaps more precisely -- with nudity.

And even more precisely -- with public nudity.

Last month, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted by the barest (pun not intended) margin -- 6 to 5 -- to ban public nudity. By public nudity, the law refers only to displaying one's genitals in public. San Francisco women are still free to walk around topless. But that is not unique...

Related Tags: San Francisco Nudity