In response to:

Attack of the Concern Trolls

goldilocks Wrote: Feb 17, 2013 2:25 PM
Pres O is hardly the worst president. What about Nixon who resigned?
MudontheTires Wrote: Feb 17, 2013 5:24 PM
I'd say Obama has done it.
MudontheTires Wrote: Feb 17, 2013 5:23 PM
"Eventually Reagan will be seen as the worst."

It's been 20+ years since Reagan left office and you progs still haven't managed to destroy "The Gippers" reputation.

Give it up, chump. The only people who will ever "see Reagan as the worst" are idiots who wanted the USSR to win the cold war.
3204 Wrote: Feb 17, 2013 4:12 PM
Wrong loser, Ronaldus Maximus (though a he believed that dhimmicrats could be trusted to keep their word) was the best president of the 20th Century.
3204 Wrote: Feb 17, 2013 4:11 PM
Nobody died from Watergate, yet the dinosaur media says Benghazi is unimportant. Sounds like covering up for Oblamebush to me.
George257 Wrote: Feb 17, 2013 3:53 PM
In the league table of worst presidents, I would say that carter takes some beating.
Auspex Wrote: Feb 17, 2013 3:50 PM
Id crack a Billy Beer to that, if I had any!
Ron-CA Wrote: Feb 17, 2013 2:42 PM
Jimmy Carter is thrilled with Obama as president because now he is known as the second worst president in US history!
Beethovens10th Wrote: Feb 17, 2013 2:40 PM
He's by far the worst president. "Elected" by the worst electorate imaginable - parasites.

Turns out the New York Times is worried about the future of the Republican Party. So concerned, in fact, it has dedicated more than 6,000 words in this week’s magazine to explore, as the title puts it, “Can The Republicans Be Saved From Obsolescence?” Indeed, the folks at The Times seem extremely concerned that which they hate might not survive. And by “concerned” I mean they’re hoping.

That The Times would seek to harm Republicans, and more specifically conservatives, is about as shocking as Piers Morgan doing a special episode on the need for gun control. But that so...