In response to:

Obama Administration Defiantly Defends Another Radical Appointee

Aesun Wrote: Oct 07, 2009 6:18 PM
BHO's selection of CZARS undergirds the culture that is like rust to iron. It makes as much sense as charging the terrorist for weapons of mass destruction but not finding any bombs, but he was making an IED, we found acetone fumes, which is a WMD, and was used in both conflicts, or why the Mother that chose not to allow her child to live by praying, is sentenced, while the mothers that chose to kill their living, growing, child in the womb is applauded and given money and protection to do so. A mothers choice is protected..right. How can you not have WMD in Iraq but have our citizens blown up by the same devise as they have not found but are charging the terrorist for. Get dummies in office and all you get back is a deterioration of...

I continue to be amazed at the naiveté of people who keep giving President Barack Obama the benefit of the doubt concerning his radical appointments, saying his administration isn't doing its job in vetting the appointees. When will they wake up to the reality that Obama is deliberately picking people, such as Kevin Jennings, who share his radical values?

Arguing with Idiots By Glenn Beck

When prescient commentators were warning of Obama's radical friends and colleagues, such as Jeremiah Wright and William Ayers, during the campaign, his apologists diverted proper scrutiny, saying it's absurd to judge...

Friday, June 01 | 02:35 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 02:35 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 02:35 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 02:35 AM ET