1 - 10 Next
"And they’re mostly in the suburbs and rural areas where there is virtually no crime and no murder." Think about that for just a moment, Moore. Or are you capable of rational, emotion-free thought?
In response to:

How Liberals Argue: Obamacare Taxes

ACHefty Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 12:24 PM
"Narrowly tailored" and "fair"? Pick one. You can't have both. You either tailor it to suit individual needs (not fair) or make it "fair" (whatever in the world that means -- which will take away all tailoring, let alone the narrow kind).
Figure skater who made something of himself after the Olympics. A golfer who made more money as an architect than a golfer. Politicians who have incorporated SOLUTIONS into their work that have actually made the country a better place. Kid Rock? Is that like a pet rock from the 70s? The GOP doesn't need rock stars. They have solutions.
It's AC. Don't give me too much credit. :-) But thanks!
No candidate is perfect. Neither is the office. Politics & Sausage. Don't watch either being made. But rather than "lesser of two evils," go for the one who comes closest. Count the things you are *FOR* and compare what side the candidates stand on with those issues. From there, the choice should be easy, no matter the political stripe. And when a candidate is also *FOR* something as opposed to "I'm not the other guy," it's usually a winning situation.
Start with Blame-Gahzi. Move to fast and furious. That ought to keep them busy for quite a while.
Please return Chris Matthews' glasses and teleprompter. He's going to need them Tuesday night. And while you're at it, you may want to adjust your outer "feelings." Your jealousy is slipping through.
Chic-Fil-A type turnout? You have that, and Chris Matthews head will explode on national TV. Should be interesting to watch.
Then what? 1. Executive order #1, rescind all previous executive orders. 2. Submit legislation to undo Obama(doesn't)Care. 3. Submit balanced budget. Problem solved. Next?
1 - 10 Next