1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Caption Contest

abugbabe Wrote: Aug 22, 2011 10:25 PM
"Bowing worked for Obama; I wonder if curtseying will work for me?"
OK, Protestant, evangelical - or whatever you want to call yourselves Christians, help me out. You object to Mormons because we offend you by saying there was an apostacy from the New testament version of Jesus Christ's church. However, the entire genesis of the protestant reformation came from the belief that the Catholic Church had strayed from (apostacized from) Jesus' teachings. Do you see any parallel? If not, what is the point of your faith? Are you not just Catholic apostates? Everyone's favorite poster "anonymous" wrote "...you will see that the Mormon church is and always has been operated as a secretive, heirarchical cult demanding time, money, and fealty of its adherents in exchange for both access to arcane knowledge (a key...
From what I hear from my Mormon sources, there's no need for you to worry about Mitt's faith.
I think this is a suggestion made by doctors who treat anorexia and want new business. Seriously, what better way to make a kid have body image issues and totally stop eating so they can stay with their family than to tell them that if they get fat, they go into foster care. All we need are 5 year-old anorexics. I thought doctors were supposed to be smart. Apparently this group isn't so bright.
Finally J Edgar Hoover will get respect from the left, not for what he did, but rather for wearing women's clothes.
I thought she was trying to say that the campaign was a distraction from running the country. I'm glad that golf, broadway, basketball, parties, etc. are the real business and not those pesky campaign stops.
In response to:

Stop Beating Up On Mitt

abugbabe Wrote: Jun 20, 2011 9:37 AM
You don't like Romeny because he's wealthy and supposedly born that way? You do know he actually worked quite hard for a long time don't you?
We should just all get on and send in stuff like: "July 3, Sarah wants spaghetti for dinner, but Todd is adamant about having meatloaf. After about 100,000 of those emails, they'd rethink the free labor thing.
In response to:

The Cancer of Regulation

abugbabe Wrote: Jun 08, 2011 9:53 PM
They'd probably pass an "omnibus" regulation acceptance bill instead - because they are lazy - or too busy sending naughty tweets - or taking bribes - ummm - fundraising.
Parents only have to control what they provide. They can't control everything, but most kids don't just go riding to the store to get a box of Lucky Charms. Parents can and should control the staples provided to their families. Government shouldn't control the staples or how families make the decisions. There was still blatantly child-centered marketing when I was a child, the difference was that I had parents instead of parental-friends. (Parents say no and are totally uncool and don't care if their kids are mad at them for doing the right thing. Parental-friends worry about your opinion of them and try to be popular with their kids.) All in all, we need more parental and less governmental involvement in all of this.
1 - 10 Next