In response to:

Two Down, Two to Go: Scott Brown Outshines Elizabeth Warren in MA Senate Debate

absinthe48 Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 7:32 AM
Seduced at first by the soothing media bath, I thought that Elizabeth Warren would make a capable senator, assuming as I did that a Republican could not hold Ted's seat in Massachusetts. Warren will probably still win, but how can anyone in DC take her seriously, what with Pocahantas-gate and now the illegal practice of law? She's damaged goods in terms of her national reputation, but she has given many of us a good old gut-rumbling laugh, which counts for something.
Maire Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 2:42 PM
David Gregory never asked her why she was practicing law and collecting some hefty legal fees without a license!
Dave M Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 10:26 AM
They don't take her seriously. She is a lib. All she has to do is mouth the right talking points.
olddoc4444 Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 8:42 AM
You forget, being a liar , for democrats, is a resume enhancement.
Maire Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 8:35 AM
Gregory never mentioned the fact that Warren has been practicing law in MA without a license?
Wayne302 Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 8:34 AM
I was never fooled by this sockdolagizing socialist fool. That consumer protection division she boasts of is just another example of how the country needs more John Galts and less Lie-A-Whoppers. Yes it is amazing how after pretending to be a Cherokee, she now want to pretend to be a Kennedy and be immune from prosecution.
conservative_one Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 8:34 AM
Liberal Democrats will support ANYBODY, anybody who talks the liberal talk.
Character doesn't matter, or honesty, or substance. Just talk liberal.
Lance6161 Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 7:45 AM
Shoot! I've got to admit............I just thought she was a crazy, marxist a ss hole!
Love of Liberty Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 7:45 AM
"Ted's seat"?
Don't you think it belongs to the people of Massachusetts? Formerly the seat belonged to the state of Massachusetts before progressives nearly a hundred years ago amended the Constitution to seize the power to appoint senators from the states and hand it over to the populace (who already had representatives of their own in Congress). Foreign countries have representatives for their interests in Washington D.|C. States do not.
Dave M Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 10:27 AM
Tells you the mindset of politicians that they think an elected office is theirs by right.
Jerry1 Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 7:39 AM
Just a FLAT out LIAR.

She should be held accountable for her remarks, if this were a Republican, they would most likely be served papers.

Tonight marked the second of four scheduled debates between incumbent Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) and his Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren. The topics of discussion ranged from the personal to the substantive -- allowing both candidates ample opportunity to make their pitch to voters. So let’s dive right in. The following is my gut reaction to how each candidate performed:

Scott Brown is a gifted debater. He was poised, prepared and aggressive all night -- always ready with a quick riposte to any misleading or factually inaccurate charge leveled against him. And he was relentless. When Elizabeth Warren asserted that...