In response to:

Oh My: Did Roberts Switch Sides at the Last Minute?

AbigailAdams4sure Wrote: Jun 28, 2012 3:38 PM
+10

If these early strands of legal detective work are correct, the revelation they've uncovered pours mounds of salt into the wound:
 

Scalia’s dissent, at least on first quick perusal, reads like it was originally written as a majority opinion http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/2012/06/evidence-that-the-votes-shifted-after-conference-initial-vote-to-declare-mandate-unconstitutional.html (in particular, he consistently refers to Justice Ginsburg’s opinion as “The Dissent”). Back in May, there were rumors floating around relevant legal circles that a key vote was taking place, and that Roberts was feeling tremendous pressure from unidentified circles to vote to uphold the...