In response to:

Why Do Feminists Attack Sarah and Not Sharia?

Aaroneous Wrote: Sep 16, 2010 12:22 AM
I find this article's central question and thesis absurd. As a feminist, humanitarian, and thinking person, I find both Palin and "Sharia law" EQUALLY appalling and worthy of scorn. In rhetoric, that's called an "either/or dilemma." There's no reason we have to support one instead of the other. That means a lot of people might & can dislike them both with equal fervor. But since in this country we don't need to confront the absurdities of Sharia law, we can and should focus on absurdities closer to home. Thankfully, as a start we have laws that attempt to protect women from abuse--objections to Sharia law are self-evident and there's no danger we'll be adopting Sharia in the future despite Mr. Giles warning about what happened in the...

Given Islam’s enslavement of women and the Sharia erection of the Cordoba Initiative’s chief con man, Abdul Rauf, you’d think N.O.W. and their ilk would now be raising more Cain about this Ground Zero Mosque than they are about Sarah Palin.

Why should one think this? Well, it’s principally because Sharia kind of sha-whizzes on hard-won women’s rights, that’s sha-why. Duh. Yet we’re not hearing a whole heck of a lot from the fiery feminists regarding this Ground Zero affront and what it could entail for the girls among us. Yep, we’re hearing crickets from the virulent vixens of...

Friday, June 01 | 02:35 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 02:35 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 02:35 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 02:35 AM ET