In response to:

The Audacity of Self-defense

A_Freeman Wrote: Jul 16, 2009 2:49 PM
Let me preface this for those who may take issue with my comment, Government is created to protect the rights of life, liberty and property/fruit of labor. Life and property being inherent, god-given, unalienable rights, springing forth from those rights then is the right to protect them. These rights remain with the individual and cannot be taken away unless through a just process. This also means that government cannot force an individual to be reliant upon others for such protection, but as an aspect of government, government may complement the ability to protect these rights.
Having stated the above, I find it troubling when people try to apply the 2nd to states. The purpose of the 2nd and other amendments was to...

Two schools of thought on the Senate's power of advice and consent on Supreme Court nominees: One -- which I support, but then-Sen. Barack Obama did not -- holds that barring extraordinary circumstances, senators should go along with a president's judicial choices.

When Senate Democrats were using the filibuster to torpedo confirmation votes of 10 of President George W. Bush's judicial nominees, the GOP leadership threatened to bar its use to kill a judicial confirmation vote. Until 14 senators -- seven Democrats and seven Republicans, dubbed the Gang of 14 -- struck a deal in 2005 that resulted in five...

Related Tags: National Security