In response to:

The Real Loser In The Massachusetts Election

A.J.6 Wrote: Jan 26, 2010 10:22 PM

We're a bit beyond "feminist" now Phyll. That's no longer the buzz word it used to be. You're a little too 1950's to fit in here anymore.

It's an accepted fact that men and women should be treated as equals and that one gender does not get preference over another.

And blaming "feminists" whomever you deem them to be (Sarah Palin, Michele Bachman, Hilary Clinton etc...)for the failure of male sports teams borders on the delusional.

You're quite the mysoginist aren't you?? YOu must hate being a woman so much that you feel other women should enslave themselves and be dutiful wives much like the way the Taliban behave.

What next will you espouse Phyl? Burquas?? Beating for women who diagree?

You're way...

Join the Debate!

Read Full Story

The Real Loser In The Massachusetts Election

Smarting from their surprise loss in the race to fill the U.S. Senate seat in Massachusetts, the Democrats are throwing their candidate, Martha Coakley, under the bus. They blame her for running a poor campaign that made losers out of Barack Obama, the Democrats, their bad health care bill and even Ted Kennedy in his grave.

Many reasons, of course, contributed to Scott Brown's remarkable victory. However, the chief reason Coakley's campaign didn't connect with the voters is that she is a feminist, causing even a liberal female TV commentator to admit she is "unappealing."