In response to:

CPAC Unwise to Snub Christie, Gays

71 911E, TX Wrote: Mar 01, 2013 6:20 PM
When I read the title of this article, I was ready to chew out Goldberg. Then I read his commentary about Christie's stupid actions and I felt a little better. But not much, as Christie's love-fest with Obummer before the election might well have determined the outcome, as close as it was in swing states.
Summers Wrote: Mar 01, 2013 6:39 PM
Does that mean that you think Christie was better liked and respected in the swing states than Romney?
71 911E, TX Wrote: Mar 01, 2013 7:07 PM
No, I think he legitimized little o for those who were too stupid to have decided by that point, hence the narrow victory in those states for the Emperor-in-Chief. Liar-in-Chief. King Obummer. Whatever.
71 911E, TX Wrote: Mar 01, 2013 7:07 PM
No, I think he legitimized little o for those who were too stupid to have decided by that point, hence the narrow victory in those states for the Emperor-in-Chief. Liar-in-Chief. King Obummer. Whatever.

What can you do with a man like Chris Christie?

The answer, according to many with the conservative movement: Throw him overboard. And while we're at it, let's toss the gays over the side too.

The popular governor of New Jersey has certainly angered many conservatives, including this humble scribe. During the crucial final days of the presidential election, Christie didn't merely embrace President Obama, he all but endorsed him.

Then, during the congressional fight over the disaster-relief bill for victims of superstorm Sandy -- a bill with more pork in it than a Jimmy Dean factory -- Christie denounced Republicans...

Thursday, May 23 | 01:40 AM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 01:40 AM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 01:40 AM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 01:40 AM ET