1 - 4
Good advice for anyone wondering if Obama's a Marxist.
So requiring an ID is denying someone a right based on their skin color? Requiring an ID is defacto desire to repeal the Voting Rights Act of 1965? Perhaps you can point to ANY SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE of your accusations? Or are you, like all liberals, more interested in hyperbole and fear-mongering than actually debating the issues? Perhaps you can tell us how many people 1) are legal residents of states who don't have picture ID's and 2) what percentage of those give a damn about voting in the first place. And please tell me why, if this is the case, Democrats have no issue with people being required to show ID to collect welfare benefits, enter social security offices (as happened recently in Florida under OBAMA'S DHS)?
In response to:

When Did the Rules Change?

5854 Wrote: Jul 17, 2010 3:44 PM
Bob-I hope you're being sarcastic. If not, I want some of that stuff you're smokin'...
In response to:

Cronkite's Offensive History

5854 Wrote: Jul 25, 2009 4:25 PM
of substandard performance.

It's incredible how the left can look defeat right in the eyes and claim that it's not so...yet it's those who knew the truth (that Tet had been as close to total victory as we'd ever get) who are accused of being "unrealistic." This is an incredibly dangerous phenomenon, and one I would venture is only possible in the US where our livelihood is not dependent on knowing the facts and distinguishing fact from fiction.

Cronkite was no more honest than today's "journalists"--and probably gave rise to the "outcome-focused reporting" we suffer from today in our news media. I hope he rests in peace
1 - 4