In response to:

Obama, Senators, Coyotes and Wolves

42Berserker Wrote: Sep 05, 2010 4:00 PM

There really are two threshold questions before that can even be considered: First, are the number of suicide bombing and assassination related deaths in Iraq fewer than the murders that are now being committed in Mexico; Second, if so, are the American people willing and is our treasury capable of supporting still another military incursion. Unless both answers are "Yes," we should not even be considering invading Mexico.

Join the Debate!

Virginia99 Wrote: Sep 06, 2010 6:57 AM

What is going on just south of our border must be terrifying to the Americans who live nearby. I would be scared to death to go out at night for fear of inadvertently wandering into the midst of a drug deal and ending up dead. These criminals are turning our border states into a war zone. We spend billions defending people all over the world. It is time that some of those troops are brought home and stationed shoulder to shoulder on our borders to discourage crossing at a minimum. Further, who is defending the regular people of Mexico? Even the elite are frightened. Recently, in the wealthy business community of Monteray, the local businessmen took out a full-page ad in the newspaper begging for government assistance to stop the drug...

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

Read Full Story

Obama, Senators, Coyotes and Wolves

How did President Barack Obama go from a sixty-nine percent approval rating in January of 2009, to being declared “Mr. Unpopular” in Time Magazine last week?

Well, in the context of a succinct, roughly 3000 word editorial, Time Magazine’s Michael Scherer successfully ignored a couple of key words that can help explain the President’s downfall - “wolves,” and “coyotes.”

And if wolves and coyotes are in the mix, then the problem must be somewhere far outside the beltway, likely among the rural Western states, in a place that is either ignored or regarded with contempt by liberal...

Related Tags: Media and Culture MSNBC