In response to:

The FBI Closes a Window to the Truth

3129 Wrote: Jul 08, 2010 6:08 PM
Soon after I left the police department to go to law school, I was asked by a police officer if it was legal for them to carry small portable tape recorders. I told that it was legal in out state. A few investigators purchased recorders with their own money. A month or two later, an officer responded to a burglary in progress and arrested the burglar.As the investigation was ending, the burglar's mother showed up and nearly started a riot. The burglar's mother was arrested, and showed up for court with about half a dozen "witnesses" who weren't even there. When the recording of the entire matter was played, the judge found the defendant guilty. The "witnesses" started filing out about 30 seconds after the tape started playing. ...

Modern recording devices are a boon to law enforcement. Wiretaps betray crooks plotting their crimes. Surveillance cameras on city streets identify muggers and drug dealers. Video gear in patrol cars shows drivers who can barely stand, much less walk a straight line.

All these provide devastating evidence in court: Jurors can witness exactly what happened. But when it comes to capturing some of the most important information available for fighting crime, the Federal Bureau of Investigation would rather see no evil and hear no evil.

Agents conducting an interrogation of someone they have detained need a record of what the suspect says. So...