In response to:

Democrats, Please Follow New York Times' Advice

3129 Wrote: Aug 10, 2010 3:24 PM
If people of faith are so weak, anti- intellectual, anti- reason, and anti scientific, why are the liberals scared s******* of Islamic people of faith? While the Talibanis truly are anti-intellectual, anti-reason, and anti-scientific, they are not weak; at least not collectively. Liberals do not fear Christians and Jews, but they are afraid of Islam. This is especially true of Europeans. I predict Europe will be a Caliphate by the end of this century.
Join the Debate!
Jim in VT Wrote: Aug 10, 2010 4:07 PM
And the punch line, when these rabid muslim freaks get their way is this: the first people in line for beheading will be the homosexuals, the liberals, the intellectual elites, and the athiests & agnostics. Of course, being the intellectual cowards leftists are, their conversion to Islam will be instantaneous.
Chris1022 Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 6:43 PM
What in the world makes you think atheists and agnostics are liberals?
Most of them I have ever meet (at least where I live) are either Libertarians or Objectivists.

Liberals' derision of "people of faith" as weak, anti-intellectual, anti-reason and anti-science is ironic beyond measure, given their stubborn adherence to their own discredited views on the thin thread of faith alone.

New York Times editors' "In Search of a New Playbook" provides a perfect illustration. They not only don't apologize for President Obama's failed policies but also insist that Democrats run proudly on his record.

They argue that for Democrats to retain control of Congress, "they need a sharper and more inspirational playbook." But they're talking about a playbook that deviates not from their tired liberal ideas, but simply from the way...