In response to:

Defending Defense: How the GOP Can Escape the Budget Box Canyon

3129 Wrote: Dec 06, 2012 1:45 PM
Defense spending is nothing compared to the total Federal payroll. The Constitution REQUIRES congress to provide for national defense. It does not require a National Labor Relations Board, a Great Society, or an Affordable Healthcare Protection Act complete with the attendant new regulatory agencies that will be created to provide more government union dues paying employees. Viva la revolucion.
ericynot Wrote: Dec 06, 2012 2:07 PM

Defense spending accounts for 20% of the federal budget. That's hardly "nothing". The point being made here is that we spend waaaayyyyyy more than necessary on defense. For instance, the F-16 can hold its own with any existing or foreseeable aviation threat, but we're budgeting $1.1 trillion for the newer F-35. Just because the Constitution allows something doesn't mean we have to do it, especially when we're already broke.

Paul Ryan and Marco Rubio wowed the Beltway conservatives last night, which is a little bit like the British cheering a successful evacuation from Dunkirk. The GOP indeed lives to fight another day, and that day will be here quickly as 2014’s candidates are already declaring –Congresswoman Shelley Moore Capito for the United States Senate in West Virginia and former Governor Michael Rounds for the same in South Dakota.

Which weights the negotiations over the fiscal cliff with a great deal of political as well as economic significance. The parties purport to care about the latter, but they are...