In response to:

The Left's Continuing War on Women

2nd Fundamentalist Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 3:04 PM
With so many cases of domestic violence, some of them heart wrenching, you would think that the victim or her family would realize that a gun in the victim's hands is the last line of defense. Nothing else can save her. Not God, not the police, not a neighbor (unless he's armed and is very close by and has heard cries for help). These victims can only be liberals. If a conservative with a gun goes down, at least he/she dies fighting.
muhl Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 3:41 PM
It is often said that murders are frequently caused by the victim's own gun. So? At least the victim had a fighting chance. Without the gun, the victim would have had NO chance. A gun does not guarantee survival. It only increases one's chances of surviving.

I wholeheartedly agree with 2nd Fundamentalist, who wrote: "If a conservative with a gun goes down, at least he/she dies fighting."

I don't ask for a guarantee. Any fool knows there are NO guarantees in life. All I want is the legal chance to defend myself. The attack on our precious Second Amendment will deny me and others of this God-Given Chance.
rickmcq Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 3:26 PM
"Nothing else can save her. Not God, not the police, not a neighbor ..."

Well, maybe not the police or the neighbor.

The New York Times caused a sensation with its kazillion-word, March 17 article by Michael Luo on the failures of state courts to get guns out of the hands of men in domestic violence situations.

The main purpose of the article was to tweak America's oldest civil rights organization, the National Rifle Association, for opposing some of the more rash anti-gun proposals being considered by state legislatures, such as allowing courts to take away a person's firearms on the basis of a temporary restraining order.

It's a new position for liberals to oppose the rights of the accused....