In response to:

An Ideological Test for Gun Ownership: The Next Logical Step in the Effort to Keep Dangerous People From Buying Firearms

2004done Wrote: Aug 08, 2012 11:43 AM
I'm going to guess that he is one of VERY DANGEROUS types, someone who thinks, and can see, from where we've gone, what is likely to happen next. I do not believe he is a gun control advocate, just is taking their "talking points" to illustrate what we should prepare ourselves for. If anything, he is "soft-soaping" the liberal reaction.
The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence says Sunday's deadly attack on a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, a Milwaukee suburb, shows "our elected officials" need to "do something." Slightly more specifically, the group says we should "Demand Congress Stop Arming Dangerous People."

I did not realize there was a federal program that supplies mass murderers with weapons. Obviously, this is a poor use of our tax dollars. Congress should not only eliminate this program but it should also prevent dangerous people from buying guns on their own.

But how do we know who is dangerous? The Brady Campaign mentions "convicted felons," "convicted...