In response to:

Benghazi: Obama and His Ilk Hung Chris Stevens and Others Out to Dry

1987worstyear Wrote: Oct 21, 2012 10:36 AM
What you are all forgetting is that Obama would never intentionally put the ambassador in harm's way. Stevens was "one of our people" as Obama himself said....handpicked and a longtime liberal ally. There may have been a slip up in intelligence....there may have been mistakes made. But at a low level and certainly security at some random obscure consulate (and there are hundreds worldwide) would not merit the attention of the commander in chief. As for the terrorists, as Bill Maher said, before the week is out, the idiot who gave that "cafe" interview to the NYT will be "pink dust"
Anne_1 Wrote: Oct 21, 2012 10:39 AM
What part of 'troops at AT THE READY, and could have BEEN there in LESS than an hour, do you NOT GET????
Doug5049 Wrote: Oct 21, 2012 10:38 AM
0bama refused Stevens' request for beefed-up security. Stevens was right there, and he rightly perceived a threat. By refusing the enhanced security, he did indeed put Stevens in harm's way.
Buck O Wrote: Oct 21, 2012 10:38 AM
'tard vomits, "0bama would never intentionally put the ambassador in harm's way."

So you admit he's incompetent. Very good.
Anne_1 Wrote: Oct 21, 2012 10:37 AM
Well, OBVIOUSLY, Obozo LEFT Stevens in HARMS WAY, now didn't he???

This past Friday the State Department released internal docs showing that Chris Stevens, U.S. Ambassador to hell’s corridor in Libya, begged Obama’s boys in D.C. to ramp up security in Benghazi. And, as we all know now, he got nothing from the State Department but was allowed to be tortured and murdered by “democracy seekers” from the “Religion of Peace” in the “liberated” nation of Libya.

As far as I am concerned, blood is dripping from Obama’s golf-gloved campaign hands. Whatever do I mean, you ask? Well, according to James Rosen’s findings in the newly released damning papers, it’s crap...