1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Solar Energy School Propaganda 101

18delta Wrote: Sep 30, 2011 1:05 PM
What about disposal of huge batteries?
In response to:

Solar Energy School Propaganda 101

18delta Wrote: Sep 30, 2011 12:56 PM
I doubt that is true. I would bet that Malkin would ENCOURAGE private investment in experimental technologies at the sizes we are now. Petroleum is the ECONOMICAL fuel that supplies the engine of the global economy. Whale oil is outmoded now. Fission is good base power, in the future there may be useable fusion power. Perhaps technology will supply a good answere for gravity generated electricity. BUt feel free to invest all of your money in Solar. Leave my money alone. get your hand out of my pocket!
In response to:

Solar Energy School Propaganda 101

18delta Wrote: Sep 30, 2011 12:47 PM
Oil at 100Bbl is still more economical than Solar or Wind. But Coal is the electrical source. You are still going to want the plastics from petroleum and fertilizers. An electric car is not viable right now
In response to:

Solar Energy School Propaganda 101

18delta Wrote: Sep 30, 2011 12:44 PM
wind is still not viable for anything other than peak. It is unreliable. Some sort of ocean wave generation would be more reliable...but there is that whole water-electricity thing.
In response to:

Solar Energy School Propaganda 101

18delta Wrote: Sep 30, 2011 12:15 PM
bad math
In response to:

Solar Energy School Propaganda 101

18delta Wrote: Sep 30, 2011 12:14 PM
7 million? 500,000 for each unemployed individual counting to 7 million is 14 people. Whom are the lucky 14? My guess is that someone did some bad math and felt clever for it. Reinforcing sloth by paying someone for not working is the epitome of moral hazard
In response to:

Solar Energy School Propaganda 101

18delta Wrote: Sep 30, 2011 12:07 PM
Does that make them a good place to lose 528million dollars of the people money?
In response to:

Solar Energy School Propaganda 101

18delta Wrote: Sep 30, 2011 12:05 PM
Uncertain if any conservative endorsed giving every unemployed person 500,000.00 that is patently unfair to those that are working...duh but you do make a good argument against the minimum wage
In response to:

Solar Energy School Propaganda 101

18delta Wrote: Sep 30, 2011 12:03 PM
I am unsure if ANY conservative has backed giving every unemployed person $500,000. You are really using the logical argument against a minimum wage. If people are better off earning a minimum of 10.00 per hour then why not make the minimum wage 20.00 per hour? Why not 100.00 per hour. What majority are you in?
In response to:

Solar Energy School Propaganda 101

18delta Wrote: Sep 30, 2011 11:59 AM
Thank you for your permission. Many who follow the current politically correct purchase patterns want to limit my freedoms from being able to spend, to you overspend, my money as I see fit. We wish that others of your stripe were so understanding.
1 - 10 Next