In response to:

Is Chris Christie Overreacting Over the NRA’s “Reprehensible” Ad?

1375 Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 11:48 AM
To fight people from the gutter, you go to the gutter. Sorry Fat Man, might be a good weighit loss program for you to get into the trenches and mix it up. There is no bottom to Libtards, nothing they will not say or do no matter how outrageous. Time for the Repubs to get mean and whip some pansy Dem asssss.
Corndog2 Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 12:16 PM
I'm with you 1375. Maintaining the moral high ground has gotten us no where. Time to take off the kid gloves and fight like our future depended on it..............because it does.

Feck christie and the horse (had to be a Clydesdale) he rode in on.
HoovervilleFollies Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 8:35 PM
"Maintaining the moral high ground has gotten us no where [sic]."

I guess I must have been away from all news sources the last time your side maintained the moral high ground. Was it during the Ford administration?

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is apparently up in arms because the National Rifle Association released an ad asking simple yet important question: If President Obama’s kids are protected by professional armed guards -- why can’t yours be, too?

I agree with the governor on a number of substantive points, but here are two things to consider:

1. The NRA -- at no point during their advertisement -- explicitly attacked Sasha and Malia Obama by name. Yes, they imply that the “president’s children” -- because of who they are -- have certain...

Saturday, May 18 | 11:56 AM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 11:56 AM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 11:56 AM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 11:56 AM ET