In response to:

Romney Was Not the Problem

08hayabusa Wrote: Nov 23, 2012 3:14 PM
Hey Loserville, Why don't you head on back to Huff-PO.
08hayabusa Wrote: Nov 23, 2012 3:18 PM
It's not my job to provide for able body Citizens. And Thomas Jefferson agrees:

Our tenet ever was . . . that Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated; and that, as it was never meant that they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action. — Thomas Jefferson
George257 Wrote: Nov 23, 2012 3:28 PM
It is a great pity that the constitution does not place an upper limit on the levels of income tax and VAT. That would render the bloated welfare state unsustainable.

Small minds always leap to the answers given the last time around, which is probably why Maxine Waters keeps getting re-elected. But the last time is not necessarily the same as this time. A terrorist attack is not the same as the Cold War, a war in Afghanistan is not the same as a war in Iraq, and Mitt Romney is not the same as John McCain or Bob Dole.

But since the election, many conservatives seem to be coalescing around the explanation for our defeat given by Jenny Beth Martin of the Tea Party Patriots, who said: "What we...