In response to:

Voters Want the Government on a Diet

/ Wrote: Aug 02, 2010 5:54 PM
More on the mandate ruling today... "While this case raises a host of complex constitutional issues, all seem to distill to the single question of whether or not Congress has the power to regulate — and tax — an individual’s decision not to participate in interstate commerce. Neither the US Supreme Court nor and federal circuit court of appeals has squarely addressed this issue. No reported case from any federal appellate court has extended the Commerce Clause or Tax Clause to include the regulation of a person’s decision not to purchase a product..." From the judge's ruling... "While this case raises a host of complex constitutional issues, all seem to distill to the single question of whether or not Congress has the power to...

Let's put government on a diet. That's what voters seem to be saying in response to the Barack Obama Democrats' vast expansion of the size and scope of government.

Evidence comes from pollster Scott Rasmussen. He asked likely voters -- his usual sample, which tilts more Republican than all adults -- whether increased government spending is good or bad for the economy.

The results were unambiguous. Good for the country? Twenty-eight percent. Bad for the country? Fifty-two percent.

He got similar results when he asked whether increasing the federal debt is good or bad for the economy....

Friday, June 01 | 11:07 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 11:07 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 11:07 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 11:07 AM ET